Free Autism Test for Adults (Autism Spectrum Test)
This free autism test for adults asks 30 questions about communication, routines, senses, interests. You get an instant score + a full explanation.

↓ Your first question is below
- What is an autism test?
- How online autism tests work
- The recognised autism tests explained
- What this test is based on
- What the autism spectrum really means
- High-functioning autism and Asperger’s
- Autism tests for adults
- Autism tests for teens
- Autism tests for children
- Female autism tests and the gender gap
- Reading your score
- What to do after the test
- Frequently asked questions
- Research and further reading
What is an autism test?
An autism test is a structured questionnaire that asks about the everyday experiences most strongly associated with being autistic: how you handle conversation, how you respond to change, how your senses behave in busy places, how deeply you focus on your interests, and how much effort you spend appearing to fit in. It produces a score that indicates how many of those traits you report, which is a different thing from a diagnosis.
That distinction matters more than anything else on this page. Every honest free autism test, including this one, is a screening tool. Screening sorts people into “probably worth a closer look” and “probably not”, and it does so imperfectly in both directions. Diagnosis is a long, individual process carried out by a clinician who takes a developmental history, speaks to people who knew you as a child where possible, and weighs several sources of evidence over hours rather than minutes.
What a good autism test for adults genuinely offers is language. A great many people reach a questionnaire like this after years of sensing that something about social life costs them more than it seems to cost others. Seeing those experiences written down as discrete, nameable items is often the first time the pattern becomes visible as a pattern rather than a personal failing. That is worth something even when the score itself is unremarkable.
How online autism tests work, and where they fall short
A free autism test you take at home works the same way any autism test online works by converting subjective experience into numbers. You read a statement, you say how strongly it applies, and each answer contributes points toward a total. The better instruments reverse the wording on some items so that people who tend to agree with everything do not automatically score highly. This test does that on six of its thirty questions.
There are four honest limitations worth stating plainly before you take any autism spectrum test.
Self-report measures self-perception, not reality. You are reporting how you think you come across, which may differ from how you actually do. People who have been told all their lives that they are “too sensitive” may over-report; people who have never had their difficulties named may under-report dramatically.
Masking suppresses scores. Someone who has spent thirty years consciously studying how other people behave and copying it may answer the social questions as though those interactions are easy, because by now they are rehearsed. This is the single biggest reason a low score does not rule autism out, and it is why this test asks about masking directly rather than inferring it.
Overlapping conditions muddy the picture. Social anxiety, ADHD, complex trauma, chronic illness and long-term burnout all produce answers that look autistic on a questionnaire. No screening tool can separate them. A clinician can.
Mood on the day moves the number. Take the same test tired, overwhelmed and after a difficult week and you will score differently than you would on a calm Sunday. Treat any single result as one data point, not a verdict.
The recognised autism tests, and why they differ
If you have been reading about autism for any length of time you will have met a handful of acronyms. They are not interchangeable. They were built for different purposes, different ages and different questions.
The AQ test (Autism Spectrum Quotient)
The AQ test is a 50-item questionnaire developed at the Autism Research Centre at the University of Cambridge and published in 2001. It is the most widely cited autistic-trait measure in the research literature, and it covers five areas: social skill, attention switching, attention to detail, communication and imagination. The AQ test was designed to quantify traits across the general population rather than to diagnose, and it is used extensively in research for exactly that reason. Its main weakness is that it was validated largely on men, and it does not ask about masking at all.
The AQ-10 test
The AQ 10 test is a ten-item short form drawn from the same Cambridge work. In the United Kingdom it appears in NICE guidance as a brief referral aid. A GP can run it in a couple of minutes to decide whether a referral for full assessment is warranted. Because the AQ 10 test is so short it is blunt by design; it is meant to open a door, not to describe anyone. If you have taken an AQ 10 test at a surgery and scored at or above the threshold, that is a prompt for assessment rather than a finding in itself.
The RAADS-R test
The RAADS-R test (the Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale, Revised) is an 80-item questionnaire published in 2011 and designed specifically for adults who reached adulthood without a diagnosis. Unlike most instruments it asks respondents to consider their whole life rather than only the present, which is useful because autistic traits are developmental and present from early childhood by definition. The RAADS-R test covers four areas: social relatedness, circumscribed interests, sensory-motor experience and language. It is longer and more demanding than the alternatives, and the RAADS-R test is often the one adults are pointed toward when a brief screen has already come back positive.
The CAT-Q
The Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire measures something different: not autistic traits themselves but the effort spent hiding them. It has three parts covering compensation, masking and assimilation. It does not screen for autism and cannot be used that way. A high CAT-Q score alongside a middling trait score is the classic signature of someone whose difficulties are invisible from the outside.
Clinical instruments
These are not questionnaires you take alone. The ADOS-2 is a structured observational assessment delivered face to face by a trained clinician. The ADI-R is a lengthy caregiver interview covering early development. The MIGDAS-2 is a sensory-and-language-based interview increasingly preferred for adults and for women. For children there are the M-CHAT-R for toddlers, the CARS-2 rating scale and the SRS-2 social responsiveness scale. These are the tools that produce diagnoses; everything else sorts people toward them.
| Test | Items | Built for | What it does well | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQ test | 50 | Adults, research | Most-cited trait measure; broad coverage | Ignores masking; validated mostly on men |
| AQ 10 test | 10 | Referral triage | Very fast; used in NICE guidance | Too blunt to describe anyone |
| RAADS-R test | 80 | Undiagnosed adults | Lifetime view, not just the present | Long; poor at separating ADHD overlap |
| CAT-Q | 25 | Masking | Captures hidden effort | Not an autism screen at all |
| ADOS-2 | Clinical diagnosis | Direct observation by a clinician | Requires trained administration | |
| M-CHAT-R | 20 | Toddlers 16–30 months | Early identification | High false-positive rate alone |
| This test | 30 | Adults and teens | Includes masking; six-area profile | Original items, not formally normed |
What this autism test is based on
The thirty questions above are original items written for this site. They are not a copy of the AQ test, the AQ 10 test or the RAADS-R test, all of which are copyrighted by their authors and licensed for non-commercial use only. What this test shares with them is the underlying structure: the trait domains that decades of autism research have converged on.
Those domains map onto the two diagnostic criterion areas used clinically. Persistent differences in social communication and interaction, and restricted or repetitive patterns of behaviour, interests or activities, including sensory differences. Plus two areas the older instruments handle badly.
| Area | Questions | What it looks at |
|---|---|---|
| Social communication | 8 | Reading intent, group conversation, literal interpretation, friendship |
| Routine and change | 5 | Response to disruption, preference for sameness, need for predictability |
| Sensory experience | 5 | Sound, light, texture, overwhelm in busy places, self-regulating movement |
| Focused interests | 4 | Depth of interest, pattern detection, absorption, collecting and ordering |
| Masking and recovery | 4 | Copying others, rehearsing conversations, social exhaustion, performing |
| Starting and switching tasks | 4 | Task initiation, transitions, open-ended instructions, time estimation |
Masking deserves its own section rather than being folded into the social items, because the two can move in opposite directions. Someone who masks heavily may report that conversation is manageable while also reporting that it exhausts them completely. A combination that a single social score would average into meaninglessness.
What the autism spectrum actually means
The word “spectrum” is almost universally misunderstood. Most people picture a line running from “a bit autistic” to “very autistic”, with everyone placed somewhere along it. That picture is wrong, and it causes real harm.
A spectrum in this sense is not a severity scale but a profile. Autism involves several distinct dimensions. Social communication, sensory processing, language, executive function, need for routine, intensity of interests. And an autistic person can be at very different points on each. One person may have fluent speech and crushing sensory sensitivity. Another may need significant daily support with communication while being entirely untroubled by noise. They are not at different points on one line; they have different shapes.
This is why “but you don’t seem autistic” is such a meaningless statement, and why the six-area profile in your result matters more than the headline number. Two people scoring 58 on this autism spectrum test can have almost nothing in common in terms of which areas drove the score.
It also explains why support needs vary so widely and why they change over time and context. The same person may need no support at all in a quiet, structured job and a great deal in an open-plan office with unpredictable demands. Autism is not a fixed quantity someone has more or less of; it is a different way the system is wired, and how disabling that is depends enormously on the environment it has to operate in.
High-functioning autism, Asperger’s, and why the labels changed
If you are asking yourself do I have autism, you have probably encountered the phrase “high-functioning autism” and may be wondering whether it applies to you. The term has largely fallen out of clinical use, and it is worth understanding why.
“High-functioning” was historically used to describe autistic people without an intellectual disability and with fluent speech. The problem is that it describes how a person appears to others rather than what they experience. Someone labelled high-functioning may be holding down a demanding job while experiencing daily sensory distress, needing complete silence for two hours after work, and finding unstructured social events genuinely unbearable. The label tells an employer or a family member that no support is needed, which is frequently the opposite of the truth. The mirror-image problem applies to “low-functioning”, which erases capability.
Clinicians increasingly describe support needs instead, which can be stated separately for different areas and can change over time.
What happened to Asperger’s syndrome
Asperger’s syndrome was a separate diagnosis covering autistic people without a language delay or intellectual disability. It was removed as a standalone category in the DSM-5 in 2013 and folded into autism spectrum disorder. Two reasons drove the change. First, the boundary never held up: clinicians applying the criteria to the same person reached different conclusions depending on their setting, which is a sign that the distinction was not measuring anything real. Second, early language delay turned out to be a poor predictor of later outcome, so splitting on it provided no useful information.
The ICD-11, used across much of the world, made the same change. Many people diagnosed before 2013 still use the term for themselves, and that is entirely their right. Some prefer it precisely because it carries different associations. But a clinician assessing you today will be working to autism spectrum criteria, and the RAADS-R test and AQ test both retain “Asperger” in their names or history simply because they predate the change.
Autism tests for adults
Most people taking a free autism test designed as an autism test for adults are not teenagers whose parents are curious. They are adults in their twenties, thirties, forties and beyond who have spent a long time suspecting something and have finally decided to look. The reasons tend to cluster: a child was assessed and the parent recognised themselves in the report; burnout made coping strategies stop working; a relationship ended over something that keeps recurring; or a colleague mentioned it offhand and it would not go away.
Adult screening has particular difficulties. The diagnostic criteria were written from observations of children, and adults have had decades to build workarounds. By forty, someone may have constructed an entire life that fits around their traits, the right job, a small number of close friends, a predictable routine, so the traits no longer create visible difficulty until something disrupts the arrangement. Screening instruments ask about present-day experience and can miss this entirely, which is why the RAADS-R test asks about your whole life rather than just now.
A good autism test for adults therefore needs to ask about effort as well as outcome. The useful question is not only “is conversation difficult” but “what does conversation cost you”. This test asks both.
If you are considering formal assessment as an adult, be prepared for long waits in most public systems and significant cost privately. Many adults decide self-identification is enough for their purposes, and that is a legitimate choice. Formal diagnosis matters most where you need workplace or educational adjustments, where another condition needs to be distinguished, or where you simply need the certainty.
Autism tests for teens
A free autism test used as an autism test for teens occupies awkward ground. Adolescence is when social demands escalate sharply. Friendship groups become more complex, unspoken rules multiply, and the gap between an autistic teenager and their peers often widens for the first time. It is consequently one of the most common ages for autism to be identified in people who were missed as young children.
It is also the age when screening is least reliable. Many of the things an autism test for teens asks about. Social exhaustion, feeling different, intense interests, dislike of noisy environments, rehearsing conversations. Are experienced by a great many non-autistic adolescents. Anxiety in particular produces a very similar profile. A high score at fifteen means considerably less than the same score at thirty-five.
The questions on this page are suitable for teenagers of about fourteen and upward, who can reflect on their own behaviour across time. Below that age a parent-report measure is more appropriate, because younger children generally cannot compare their inner experience to other people’s.
If you are a teenager taking this free autism test yourself: the result is information, not a label, and it is worth showing to an adult you trust rather than carrying alone. If you are a parent, resist presenting the score to your child as a finding. Ask them about the specific experiences instead.
Autism tests for children
Autism tests for children work differently in one fundamental way: they are answered by an adult about the child, not by the child about themselves. A six-year-old cannot report that their response to change differs from other children’s, because they have no access to other children’s inner experience.
The recognised childhood instruments reflect this. The M-CHAT-R is a twenty-item parent questionnaire for toddlers between sixteen and thirty months, widely used at routine health checks. The CARS-2 is a clinician rating scale based on direct observation. The SRS-2 is completed by parents and teachers and is useful precisely because it captures behaviour across two very different settings. The AQ family also has child and adolescent versions completed by parents.
Early identification genuinely matters, because support provided early changes developmental trajectories in a way that support at twenty-five cannot. But childhood screening also produces a high rate of false positives, many toddlers flagged by a brief screen turn out not to be autistic, which is exactly why a positive screen leads to assessment rather than to a diagnosis.
If you are concerned about a child, the questionnaire on this page is the wrong tool. Speak to your health visitor, GP or paediatrician, and to the child’s school, who see them in a setting you do not.
Female autism tests and the diagnostic gender gap
Autism was described, studied and defined almost entirely through the observation of boys. The consequences are still being unpicked, and they are the single largest known blind spot in autism screening.
Girls and women are diagnosed later, less often, and more frequently misdiagnosed first. Commonly with anxiety, depression, an eating disorder, or borderline personality disorder. The most consistent explanation is that autistic girls mask earlier and more successfully. Social camouflaging is reported more often by women: studying how other girls behave, assembling a workable imitation, rehearsing conversation, and maintaining the performance at enormous cost. From outside, nothing looks wrong. From inside, ordinary socialising is exhausting work.
Presentation differs in other ways too. Autistic girls’ focused interests are more often socially acceptable in content, animals, fiction, a particular musician, psychology, so the intensity is read as ordinary enthusiasm rather than noticed as unusual. Friendships may exist but be few, intense and difficult to sustain. Sensory difficulties are frequently dismissed as fussiness.
No separate, validated “female autism test” exists as a distinct instrument. What exists are adaptations that weight masking more heavily, and interview-based approaches such as the MIGDAS-2 that are generally considered better at picking up this presentation than observational tools designed around boys. This test includes masking as one of its six areas for that reason. If you are a woman whose masking score is high while your social score is moderate, that combination is meaningful and worth taking to an assessor. It is precisely the pattern that brief screens miss.
Reading your score
When you finish the questions you get a number out of 100 and a band. Here is what those bands mean before you see yours.
| Score | Band | A reasonable reading |
|---|---|---|
| 0–20 | Very few autistic traits | Few of the experiences this test asks about apply to you. |
| 21–35 | Few autistic traits | Some traits present, at a level common across the general population. |
| 36–52 | Some autistic traits | A noticeable cluster. Worth looking at which areas drove it. |
| 53–68 | Many autistic traits | A substantial number reported. Many people here pursue assessment. |
| 69–100 | A high number of autistic traits | Most items applied to you. Assessment is worth considering seriously. |
Two cautions. First, the bands are descriptive, not diagnostic. There is no threshold here above which someone is autistic. Second, the six-area profile beneath your score carries more information than the score itself. A total of 55 built almost entirely from sensory and routine items describes a very different person from a 55 built from social and masking items, and the second is far more likely to lead somewhere on assessment.
What to do after the test
Whatever your result, nothing is required of you. Plenty of people take an am I autistic quiz, find the language useful, and go no further. That is a complete and reasonable outcome.
If you want to go further, the sequence that tends to work is this. Write down three or four concrete examples from your own life for each area that scored highly. Specific incidents, not general statements. Clinicians work from examples, and “I find open-plan offices difficult” is far less useful than an account of what actually happened the last time you had to work in one. If you can, find out what you were like as a young child, because the criteria require traits to have been present from early development; a parent, an older sibling, a school report or an old photograph can all help.
Then take that to a GP or a clinician who assesses adults. Bring the examples, not the score. An online result is not evidence and no assessor will treat it as such, but the material you gathered while thinking about it is exactly what they need.
Frequently asked questions
Is this autism test free?
Yes, completely. Every part of this free autism test is free. There is no payment, no email address, no account and no paywall at the end. This is a free autism test in the full sense. Your result appears immediately and costs nothing.
How long does the test take?
About six minutes for thirty questions. There is no timer, and your answers are saved in your browser as you go, so you can stop and come back.
Can an online autism test diagnose me?
No. No autism test online can diagnose anyone, including this one. Diagnosis requires a clinician, a developmental history and usually several hours. A questionnaire indicates whether that process might be worth starting.
I keep asking myself “do I have autism”. Will this answer it?
It will give you a structured answer to a narrower question: how many autistic traits do you report, and in which areas. That is genuinely useful, and it is not the same as answering do I have autism. Only an assessment settles that, and many people find the trait profile more useful in daily life than the label would be.
How accurate is this compared with the AQ test or the RAADS-R test?
Honestly: the AQ test and RAADS-R test have published validation studies behind them and this test does not. What this test offers instead is coverage the older instruments lack. Particularly masking, which the AQ test does not ask about at all. And a six-area profile rather than a single number. Use this as a structured starting point, and treat any instrument’s score as indicative rather than definitive.
Should I take the AQ 10 test as well?
If you are in the UK and heading for a GP appointment, knowing roughly how you would score on the AQ 10 test is useful because that is the brief screen many surgeries use. Taking several questionnaires and comparing them is reasonable; a consistent picture across different instruments is more persuasive than one high score.
What if I score low but still think I am autistic?
Trust that. No am I autistic quiz is built to catch people who have masked for decades. Screening tools systematically under-detect people who mask well, and masking is learned so thoroughly by adulthood that it can be invisible even to the person doing it. If your lived experience says one thing and a questionnaire says another, the questionnaire is the weaker evidence.
Is this an autism test for teens as well as adults?
The wording suits roughly fourteen and upward. As an autism test for teens it works reasonably, with the caveat that adolescence produces many of these experiences in non-autistic people too, so a high score at that age means less than it would later. For younger children, a parent-report instrument is the right tool rather than an autism test for teens.
Can I take the test more than once?
Yes. Your first answers are usually the most accurate because they are the least considered. If you retake it after a long gap and get a very different result, that gap is itself informative. It usually reflects how you were feeling rather than any change in you.
Do you store my answers?
Your answers stay in your own browser and are used to calculate the score shown to you. We do not ask for your name, your email address or any identifying detail.
Is autism the same as Asperger’s?
Asperger’s syndrome was merged into autism spectrum disorder in 2013. Anyone assessed today is assessed against autism criteria. Many people diagnosed before the change still use the older term, which is entirely their choice.
What is the difference between an autism test and an autism spectrum test?
Nothing meaningful. The phrases are used interchangeably. An autism spectrum test and an autism test both describe a questionnaire measuring autistic traits. “Spectrum” simply reflects the current diagnostic name.
Research and further reading
Everything on this page draws on published work. The sources below are the primary papers behind the instruments discussed, plus general reference material. Where a paper is open access the full text is free to read.
The instruments
Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Skinner R, Martin J, Clubley E (2001). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Males and Females, Scientists and Mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5–17.
The original paper introducing the AQ. Worth reading for the five trait areas it proposes and for the frank discussion of what a 50-item self-report can and cannot establish.
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005653411471 ·
Full text (PDF, Autism Research Centre)
Allison C, Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S (2012). Toward Brief “Red Flags” for Autism Screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 Cases and 3,000 Controls. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(2), 202–212.
The paper that produced the AQ-10, the ten-item screen now referenced in UK clinical guidance.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.11.003 ·
Find on PubMed
Ritvo RA, Ritvo ER, Guthrie D, et al. (2011). The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R): A Scale to Assist the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Adults: An International Validation Study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(8), 1076–1089.
The validation study behind the RAADS-R, including the reasoning for asking adults about their whole life rather than only the present.
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-010-1133-5 ·
Find on PubMed
Hull L, Mandy W, Lai M-C, et al. (2019). Development and Validation of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire (CAT-Q). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
The paper that put masking on a measurable footing, and the reason this test treats masking as its own area rather than folding it into the social questions.
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-018-3792-6 ·
Find on PubMed
Reviews and context
Wigham S, Rodgers J, Berney T, Le Couteur A, Ingham B, Parr JR (2019). Psychometric properties of questionnaires and diagnostic measures for autism spectrum disorders in adults: A systematic review. Autism, 23(2), 287–305.
A systematic review comparing how well the adult screening instruments actually perform. The single most useful source if you want to know which questionnaire to trust and by how much.
DOI: 10.1177/1362361317748245 ·
Find on PubMed
Loomes R, Hull L, Mandy W (2017). What Is the Male-to-Female Ratio in Autism Spectrum Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 56(6), 466–474.
The meta-analysis behind the widely quoted conclusion that the true sex ratio is closer to 3:1 than the 4:1 reported in clinical samples, meaning a substantial number of autistic girls and women go unidentified.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.03.013 ·
Find on PubMed
Woodbury-Smith MR, Robinson J, Wheelwright S, Baron-Cohen S (2005). Screening adults for Asperger Syndrome using the AQ: A preliminary study of its diagnostic validity in clinical practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
An early examination of how the AQ behaves when used for screening in a real clinic rather than in a research sample.
PubMed: 16119474
General reference
These Wikipedia entries are well sourced and a reasonable starting point if a term on this page is unfamiliar.
- Autism – overview of characteristics, history and current understanding.
- Autism spectrum – what the spectrum model means and how diagnostic categories have changed.
- Autism-Spectrum Quotient – the AQ, its versions, and documented criticisms of specific items.
- Asperger syndrome – the former diagnosis and why it was merged into autism spectrum disorder.
- Autistic masking – camouflaging, who does it most, and what it costs.
- DSM – the manual whose criteria underpin assessment in much of the world.
- Autism Test – Advanced Autism Assessment Test.
- Autism Test for Teens Take the free Autism test for Teens on this site.
- RAADS-R Test – Free RAADS-r Test.
- Free IQ Test for Children – Free IQ Test for Kids – 6 Age groups, 24 questiosn.
More Autism and Aspergers Tests.
Official RAADS R Test website.
Am I Austistic Quiz website.
Official Aspergers Test website.
RAADS-R Test at MyAutismTests.com
CPS Test – Test your Click Speed
IQ Test for Kindergarteners – Test your Child’s IQ.